Similar chart as this one I found on one of Stefano’s web pages. I decided to use his comments, explain my opinion and in same time provide some information about my system. It is much reading but it may be interesting.
Back to myrulet.com	Stefano's comments	Stefano's comments, I tried to get information from Mark but he did not respond. Maybe soon I may get more information.	Stefano's comments	My comments
	Stefano Hourmouzis Roulette Computers	Competing Computer (Mark Howe)	Competing Computer (Forester IQE6)	Explanation
Hardware:	Virtually any late model cellular phone, and various other components depending on model	Psion 3a (vendor claims to offer mobile phones also, but not one person has ever seen it)	Off-the-shelf electronic box and programmable chip (approx $15 in parts, and an hour to assemble)	It is not $15 it is about $50 for parts. But why he did not write that cost of his Nokia is $50 or paper system which he sells for $2000 costs less then $1.  IQE6 is designed and built with only one purpose. it is custom built device with everything needed for accurate calculation . This days we buy DVD player for $40 but if someone in Australia buys parts and tries to make custom version the price will not be even close.  I have seen Mark Howe's computer built in mobile phone, and it is very incorrect from Stefano to say that  not one person ever seen it.
Language for Menu and audio predictions	English by default. You can have it in any language you want for an additional US$1,000.	English	N/A (no menu or audio predictions)	It does not need  language because it is applicable everywhere. System does additional calculation and calculates when the ball is over predicted number then gives signal to player.
Wheel Timings Data Acquisition:	Manual clicks (standard roulette computer), OR	Manual clicks (subject to human error)	Manual clicks (subject to human error)	With IQE6 human errors are reduced to close to zero. Stefano sells extra video camera only to record spins in casino, then you manually transfer data to his phone.  When  customer have problem he tries to sell and camera for $2000. Not bad $200 worth camera for 10 times higher price.  The point here is that it is simple camera that only records video spins it is not solution where you simply point camera which would automatically detect ball and rotor speeds. After you finish recording you need to go home use video editing software and in slow motion find out rotor and ball timings. IQE6 does not need it, it takes timings directly from your clocking and it has special parts of program to analyze it and make decisions. The system uses something close to Fuzzy logic, and you would not get much better results even if you use laser pointing to wheel to get 100% accurate timings.
This is how the computer knows what the wheel and ball timings are	Image recognition hardware & software (Hybrid Roulette Computer): simply point a video camera at the wheel for predictions. This method is not subject to human error. The technology is patent pending and not available elsewhere. NOTE: hit rates stated below are relevant for the standard computer only. Hit rates are much greater for the Hybrid.
*Average exact number hit rate on older LEVEL wheels:	1 in 20	1 in 35	1 in 35	It is wrong, My system is not designed at all for old wheel. It may give problems and to many unpredicted spins. Because of to fast ball deceleration. It is only Stefano's imagination what my system can do or can not.
*Average exact number hit rate on modern LEVEL wheels:	1 in 25	Ineffective	Ineffective	Wrong again, with what he demonstrated on his video spins he can not have any advantage.  The ball does not hit rotor with constant distance from prediction at all.  His result is possible only by luck or cheating. Results and tests on kitchen table are completely different compared to casino results. Even if ball does not bounce at all, hardly that he would have any advantage. With 3 independent tests his computer could not produce any advantage.
				I can talk only about how accurate computer can predict failing point, but real advantage is dependent on which wheel we play and how early prediction we want to be.  Hit rate depends from wheel to wheel, and if observed on small sample pretty much on luck as well. I have experienced anything, on good wheel and with some luck I even had 1:6 for 30 spins. On some wheels it is imposable to predict until system is set to have very late prediction.  It is because of deformations on wheel track or ball shape.  That causes ball with 100% same speed to travel very different distances.
*Average exact number hit rate on TILTED Wheels:	1 in 12	1 in 20	1 in 20	Tilt 2 system should hit predicted number  with only few numbers tolerance.  Because of high accuracy in ball speed measurement even some calculations for probability of ball bouncing are included.  It produces better results then on leveled wheel, it is easier to play but only spins with highest probability to strike dominant diamond would be predicted.
Wireless Capable:	YES	YES	NO
Type of Wireless:	Hidden Network, and/or Signal Generator	Signal Generator only	NO	N/A
How the player is told where to bet:	Wireless earpiece: single number, or 3 numbers, OR	Wireless earpiece: single number	The device will give you a painful electric zap (yes you read right) when the predicted number on the wheel passes the reference diamond (very difficult to stand the pain over any more than 10 mins). You then manually and visually rotate the "tuned" prediction by the required angle - you do this for every spin. This is impossible to do in real casinos. Even if you could, and even if the algorithms were accurate (which they are not) there is still enormous potential for human error.	Wireless, could be handy. I am thinking to make it but definitely not the way as Stefano did. He is using Hearing aid  with T coil and induction loop from Nokia. That is what casinos equipment is designed to detect. Perhaps it was good idea years ago when Mark Howe start using it, when it was new. For someone who does not  know, Induction loop emits huge induction in space so T- coil in hearing aid can pick it up. and transfer to sound. I would never ever use it in casino for any serious play.
	Speakerphone: excellent for practicing, OR	Speakerphone: excellent for practicing
	Vibration mode (various options): accurate to within 3 pockets. This is most frequently used as it cannot be detected
Variable Vibration Intensity and Duration:	YES, you can make pulses have any duration or intensity you like	N/A (no vibration)	N/A (no vibration)	I am smart enough to know that vibration cannot be used in roulette prediction. Other way why would I design zap circuit. Vibration is done with small electromotor which is to slow in response time.   Stefano's phone with vibration vibrates across almost 1/2 wheel. He calls it sector play. Zap is only few ms long and can point single number.  Well, for Stefano everything is good and works, for me only what is really effective.
Prediction Process	First two wheel clicks (either full or half revolution), then either 2,3,4 or 5 ball clicks. Very flexible - you can set to use more clicks for better accuracy.	First three ball clicks, then two wheel clicks (this is in the incorrect order as any professional should know!)	You constantly click the button for both the wheel and ball until they reach a speed the computer can deal with.	Please scroll mouse here to read explanation.[1]
What is required to make one prediction			This is because with linear (straight-line) graphs, you have a very small window in which the clicks and timings MAY produce an accurate prediction.
			With this method, you may have clicked over 10-15 times for just one prediction.	Scroll here[2]
Mathematics	Complex polynomials to the order of 6. It is the only mathematics that can accurately model what occurs on the wheel.	Sinusoidal mathematics. It is impossible to accurately model real ball deceleration with such mathematics.	Linear modeling of the wheel and ball deceleration. Instead of modeling the ball deceleration with a "curved" graph, it uses a straight graph. The user constantly clicks the button until the computer detects the speed it is waiting for. It is a cheap and ineffective way of substituting for the algorithms that should be used - complex polynomials.	I cannot comment what they are using in calculation, I can comment only results they produce. Iqe6 is nothing as Stefano describes. I get sick of them hearing how good mathematics they use. Roulette system needs solutions and ideas. I have seen even formulas which they claim to use. A part of it is even angle of the wheel towards rotor. I still did not figure out how they do measure it.  It is all rubbish and only  pretending to be smart.  By my opinion it is imposable to calculate roulette function with good accuracy because it changes during play. But it is easy to copy it as it is and only measure difference to follow changes. That is what Iqe6 is doing and that is why it is so accurate. Even if Stefano calculates it accurately  at his kitchen table at home, that would be wrong way.  Now if you have time take his video do same graph based on his results and you will see that his computer does not have any prediction.
This is the heart of any computer. If the mathematics is incorrect, the computer cannot succeed.		It is no different to using linear (straight-line graphs).	This mathematics can only work for heavily tilted wheels - NOT for level wheels. This is because the maths determines only ball drop time, but it does NOT tell you accurately WHERE the ball will drop.	You cannot use static function on roulette defined on one spin.  It must be dynamic as IQE6 is doing .  To apply Iqe6 as on heavily tilted wheel would be suicide. He obviously does not have idea what he is talking about. To see how well Iqe6 can define where the ball will hit follow the link  to forum
		This mathematics can only work for heavily tilted wheels - NOT for level wheels. This is because the maths determines only ball drop time, but it does NOT tell you accurately WHERE the ball will drop.
Number of players that can receive predictions with wireless versions:	2	1	N/A (no wireless)	Team play could be good,  but for any big play communication is problem. Haring aid and inductive loops are definitely not solution. If 2 persons are involved player needs to win and 2 times larger amount of money. Wining more money for side players brings more casino heat.  IQE6 is designed for my needs. Recently more people pushing me to designed it for team play. It is easy to designed it and to make it but implementation is more complicated then it looks.
The purpose of using wireless technology (legally) is so not one specific player is looking at the wheel while winning big (to avoid suspicion). If only ONE operator can receive predictions, there is little point to using wireless technology.
Transmitters installed into any common object such as pens	YES	YES	N/A	Not applicable, but it is easy to add.  Transmitters can be very small but receivers are not.
Number of signal bursts required for wireless:	1	5	N/A	N/A
The more signal bursts there are, the easier the signals are to detect
Wireless Encrypted:	YES	NO	N/A	He is talking rubbish again. He can encrypt communication as much as he wants, but what is the point if inductive loop is not encrypted. Casino can hear all your numbers called.
Video demo of level wheels provided (with lava lamp & continuous footage):	YES	NO (despite the competitor's claims he has such a video, he refuses to provide it to anyone). The only video demo he's provided is only of an inadequate 60 spins, and the footage is badly corrupted (invisible) in the centre. The footage is almost certainly fraudulent.	NO	Stefano's video is only showing how  his computer is ineffective. Mark Howe demo does not look bad.
Vibration mode capable:	YES (variable speed and intensity), and various methods of roulette computer vibration application	NO	NO	Vibration is useless, it is to slow because of motor slowness to respond.
This is the only truly undetectable method for relaying bets.
Variable Sound Volume:	YES	NO	N/A (No sound)	N/A
Wireless Earpiece & Induction loop (wireless earpieces are not recommended)	YES	YES	NO	N/A
Completely invisible wireless earpiece	YES (model of choice)	YES	N/A	N/A But what is the point. Anybody can buy any size. It is not his product so why he would get credit for that. Apparently Mark Howe makes his own specially designed for his needs.
This should be considered irrelevant though as it's the induction loop that gets players caught, not the earpiece
Audio Predictions Given	YES	YES	NO,  But it may be good. It could save few numbers in accuracy. It maybe practical.  The problem is communication, you can not let speaker run, so you must use hearing aid. To add it to Iqe6 it takes only extra $25 chip which will transfer data to sound.  I do not mind building it but I do not have right solution for communication. Recently  I am thinking to go for something as that or to go for system that will be size of 10c  coin.  Additional problem with audio is that you must play only one ball direction or take care about it. With zap prediction system doesn't need to care in which direction the  ball  is traveling.
If you can actually hear where to bet
Electronically Shielded	YES	NO	NO, plus the actual mechanism that tells you where to bet is a high voltage electric zap - literally the WORST thing imaginable to use. This is extremely easy for casino surveillance equipment to detect. Of all options, a high voltage zap is what the vendor chose to use, indicating he is anything but knowledgeable. It makes the device very, very easy to detect.	Any electronics equipment can be detected with right equipment. Casinos defiantly do not scan band on which  FF would work. Here Stefano trying to disrespect my engineering skills simply because I chose to use zap. To design circuit of few mm size that can produce zap is not easy job. I could easy use one of those programmable talking chips or let microprocessor to drive motor as in mobile phones to produce vibrations if that would be better idea. Idea is what counts, and if you have one tell me, I will make it.
If a device is not shielded, the mere operation of it with simple button clicking can be detected. The higher the voltage, the easier a device is to detect. Like when you flick a light switch, you may notice the TV flicker. This is called "radiant electricity" which as an energy researcher, I'm very familiar with. For more information, research "Tesla's Radiant Electricity".
Ability to manually enter SAMPLE TIMINGS from recorded footage	YES	NO	He needs that because he designed computer around wrong idea. IQE6 does not need it, because it learns wheel by itself. I would like to highlight additional problem here.  Perhaps Stefano does not know that video recording is consists of video frames with difference in time of 40 m seconds and that is only of every second  line to be displayed as 1/2 of picture. Taking data from video spin in slow motion can be used only as approximate value. System would need much better accuracy then that. 40 ms crates about 9 number difference. His cheaper camera (not really cheep, he sells it for  about $800) takes only 30 frames per sec.  This means that even if we use image recognition software to predict directly from video spin accuracy would not be as good as IQE6 produces.  With clocking average person creates errors of about 30 ms, with correction it is reduced to equivalent of under 10 ms. So if his computer really have correction why to use camera to get less accurate data.  It is obvious that his $30 000 system  does not exist or it is less efective then IQE6.
This ensures human errors in timings are eliminated.
Ability to manually enter timings in PLAY MODE to test accuracy of algorithms:	YES, you can see EXACT output including predicted rotations.	NO, so to explain the computer's ineffectiveness, the vendor can simply claim you are incompetent, not that the algorithm's are inaccurate.	NO, so to explain the computer's ineffectiveness, the vendor can simply claim you are incompetent, not that the algorithm's are inaccurate.	What is the point. You type in something and you get something out. It is without meaning. Computer needs to be tested in active test not passive as Stefano describes.  I designed test and recommend to everybody to do it. Test accuracy of system and of your clocking before any play. That same test Stefano's computer cannot pass at all. It produces random results. Recently he did show video claiming to do my test but it is only another of his manipulations. Clocking only on one diamond same ball speed all the time. He uses continuous clocking until ball reaches particular speed. Typical basic tilt wheel prediction. That is why he could not demonstrate clocking on different diamond where ball speed and wheel position would be different but result still should be same because it is same spin. His explanation that he would manually readjust computer is funny.  The computer should produce same result without any adjustment. That is the point of test. Find more information at my web (testing and testing 2)
This allows you to see the output of the mathematical equations and verify the authenticity and accuracy of the computer's algorithms. Without this feature, you cannot determine the true accuracy of a roulette computer without the factor of the operator's competence. Any computer without this feature almost certainly has something to hide, because this feature is ESSENTIAL to establish accuracy.
Tuning (very important):	Visual, Manual, Advanced Automatic Tuning, and Dynamic Algorithms.	Visual: This is where you look at the wheel each spin and "mentally" determine the number of pockets from the "raw" prediction to the "tuned" prediction. This is not recommended as it's extremely difficult.	Visual only: you have to observe the wheel every spin and manually adjust where to bet a specific angle such as 70 degrees. This is impossible in the real casino environment.	This is total rubbish. I use manual adjustment simply because it is the best. You do not have to type every number in phone as Stefano does. Don't forget you must do it with foot switch clicking it 8 times for number 8. That number 8 could be result of ball instantly stopped or ball rolled across rotor. Computer does not know that but I do and I mark it. He can't mark amount of bouncing on top of result.  Human decision is needs so the real pick point of prediction can be defined fast.
Without tuning, predictions are called "raw predictions". Tuning is essential for accuracy.	Visual: This is where you look at the wheel each spin and "mentally" determine the number of pockets from the "raw" prediction to the "tuned" prediction. This is not recommended as it's extremely difficult.	Manual: you have to check the scatter graph then manually tune based on your own analysis. If the wheel speed varies during play, you get the prediction anyway whether it will be accurate or not.	If the wheel speed varies, you get the prediction regardless. You cannot even restrict acceptable wheel speeds, and it does not have anything close to "dynamic" tuning. This contributes to enormous inaccuracies.	QE6 does not have problem with rotor as Stefano's computer. Iqe6 predicts almost every spin not only similar spins as his computer. There is no problem if rotor speed increases. With that I mean full adjustment, including increase in scatter. For Stefano's computer you must enter rotor timings and play rotor speeds only close to selected one. He needs restrictions because his computer really does not predict and calculate as computer should do.
	Manual: You see the scatter chart and rotate predictions to tune manually. The tuned predictions are rotated a set number of pockets. If the wheel is outside a speed range you set, the computer notifies you.	If the wheel speed varies, you get the prediction regardless. You cannot even restrict acceptable wheel speeds, and it does not have anything close to "dynamic" tuning. This contributes to enormous inaccuracies.		After all testing I come to conclusion that his computer is based on his Genuine Winner system where it only looks for similar spins trying to find average results. Sure that if from very slow rotor, speed changes to fast that it may cause problems  to anybody because many things change. So you stop playing, or readjust system. Stefano's computer is sensitive with smallest changes and most what you hear is "risk".  When computer fails to predict Stefano asks you to include risk function.
	Advance Automatic Tuning: using chi-squared and standard deviation statistical analysis, the computer will automatically tune the computer for you as you play. If the wheel is outside a speed range you set, the computer notifies you.			This means from 100 spins in same direction you may get 10 spins predicted. And with every new dealer you run in to toilet and change settings. Of course prior to that you need camera recording to get timings for new wheel. His claim that his computer uses fully automated tuning is total rubbish. He couldn't even do it on kitchen table or on his DVD.  Next he claims dynamic tuning witch is total nonsense. It would require hundreds of spins. Specially because his computer is inaccurate. Just looks his video spins. Computer predicts around zero the ball hits rotor around 34. Next time for same prediction the ball hits rotor on opposite side. Even if scatter is zero he would  not have any advantage. From so inaccurate prediction there is no way that any valuable graph can be developed even after hundreds of spins.
	Dynamic Tuning: The greater the wheel speed, the further the ball will come to rest from the point of "raw prediction". The "dynamic" feature will automatically tune for each spin based on the speed of the wheel when the ball is predicted to fall. For example, if the wheel timing is 4000MS, then the ball may come to rest +10 pockets from the "raw prediction". If the wheel speed is 3000MS (faster), the ball may come to rest at +15 pockets from the raw prediction. This is a 5 pocket difference! Without this feature, ordinary computers would give predictions as if the wheel speed were the same every time, which it's not. Without this feature, even if a computer perfectly predicted where the ball will actually begin to fall, the difference in wheel speed between spins may make other computers almost completely ineffective.			What Stefano doesn’t know is that IQE6 uses dynamic tuning not only for rotor but for ball as well. For what he calls “risk” IQE6 makes adjustment. He can only talk about dy-namic tuning but when he wants to do computer testing he recommends manually enter-ing data simply because his computer cannot pass any dynamic test. If what he calls row prediction is so inaccurate as he shows on his demo or his DVD’s that I have, there is no point for anything else. His row prediction definitely does not show constant prediction of ball failing point.[3]
Risk Assessment (lets you know when a prediction is likely to be inaccurate due to various factors)	YES, you can set any acceptable wheel speed range. When the wheel is outside the range you select, the computer announces "risk". You can set whatever wheel speed range you like to accept 100%, 50%, 25% or even 10% of predictions (most players set to 100% so ALL wheel speeds are accepted and "risk" is never announced). the computer can also be set to announce "risk" when your clicks are obviously very inaccurate.	NO	NO	YES, System is smart if system cannot find logic from your clocking and if system cannot correct it up to reasonable level it will simply not predict. Stefano's risk based on rotor speed looks as useless to me. Some people after having problem with his computer tried it believing it will give better accuracy. But they could hear 80% only "risk " , after 100 spins they get predicted only 10% but accuracy still did not improve.
In-Built Scatter Analysis	YES, scatter graph with auto or manual tuning - can automatically tune dynamically (as you play)	Scatter graph only: you must manually check the scatter graph privately then manually tune. The tuning is not automatic.		Definitely wrong way of analyzing data.  With system I am giving and detail explanation what to look for when playing. Computer will never be able to do it. His computer has only simple data, in format of predicted number and final number. There is no data how did ball come to final number. It can work after few hundred of spins and if computer produces good enough prediction, but definitely it would be slow process.
Ability to make accurate predictions with 8-10 before the ball falls on level wheels	YES	NO	NO	Sick, this man has no idea what IQE6 can do.
Ability to make predictions BEFORE the wheel spins	YES (repeating pattern analysis software). So even if no bets are permitted after the wheel spins, you will still have a valuable tool.	NO	NO	Even worst, but of course if he can sell for $2000 paper system that predicts same way for him everything is possible.  NO , Iqe6 cannot predict before then dealer spins. And I am afraid I will never have such system simply because I am to honest and I do not talk rubbish just to take someone's money. But this is strong indication that his computer really does not even try to predict but works same as his paper system.
Can take timings of partial revolutions:	YES	NO	NO	Should we laugh with this. Even E5 was doing it.
Without this feature, predictions are given significantly later.
Authenticity Certificates (ensures software is original and professionally written/coded)	Digitally Signed to confirm origin. This signing cannot be simply changed.	NO	NO	Woooo , why?
Copyrighted:	YES	NO	NO	And again why?
Security Codes Required (protects against unauthorised use)	YES	NO	NO	Read what Microchip tells you about protecting chip that I use. They guaranty that nobody can crack it , It only needs  one bit to set when programming chip.  Is he trying to teach father how to make kids, or what ?
Prediction Presentation:	Single number, multiple numbers, sectors	Single Number	Electric zap when the "raw" predicted number (single number) passes the reference diamond, then you mentally/visually tune	Incorrect again, I have Marks Set up DVD and I know that he can select anything as result of prediction. It is obvious that Stefano wrote all of this only to discredit Mark or myself.   FF predicts single number, if player does not know which numbers to play next to that number I think he better never come close to roulette. For me computer that talks to you 26,0,32 is stupid. Only gives more data and longer data in the air, so it can be scanned and even detect position of player. My system uses only few milliseconds., now compare it to usage of 2-3 sec until computer transmits numbers. Signal of few ms. hardly can be noticed in between all other noise signals in the air.
Batteries:	Rechargeable Lithium (charger provided)	Watch battery (non rechargeable)	2 x AA	Yes you can save with rechargeable batteries. Perhaps I may add that I use same AA batteries for all year. Power consumption of device is very small. Because of that design If I decide to make it as 10 c coin it can use world smallest battery.  And that is probably what is going to happened.
Rapid software shutdown (allows the program to be locked and invisible at the press of a button)	YES	NO	NO. You would have a hard time explaining an odd looking black box.	Really...., casino can not hear what I was doing if they find out Electronic tense machine on me which helps me with headaches, or which relaxes muscle I do not think that I will be much in trouble. But if they find mobile phone attached to switch on foot how I would explain that. On top of that hearing aid in my ear, induction loop around neck and receiver on the belt. With his phone you must use all of that if you want apply it in real environment.
				If you are suspected of using a device, you're gone!
				The trick is not to be suspected in the first place.
Effective on all wheel designs (including scalloped)	YES, and includes a legally binding 200% money-back guarantee to support this.	NO	Only empty promise. Stefano directly refused to me to return 6 of his computers. Instead he insist on names of all 6 buyers. I gave him only one name that he already knows because we do not want him to disable all phones and he replied that that person is laying to me that he had only small problem with computer but now he is buying his $30 000 system. Soon after he sent email to all buyers threatening them with court action because prior purchase they had to sign agreement to never talk about computer or to never pass it to anybody. I know all of this because I sold my system to many who owned his computer.
Ability to test accuracy of samples before play	YES (audible beeps heard when ball and/or wheel revolutions are anticipated)	NO	NO	Only additional help to casino to get easier detected. What is the point of hearing sound on each click?
Ability to save profiles/data for multiple wheels (so you don't have to delete data and set up again every time you play a different wheel)	YES	NO (data must be deleted and you must set up again to play another wheel)	NO	There is no need for that if computer tunes so fast as IQE6. Stefano needs to have selection of preset parameters. You do it manually or with camera where you record spin then again manually take data from spin and enter in to phone.. You save it in phone come to play and if conditions on wheel match what you selected system will predict.
Control of human error in timings:	YES	NO		This man really has no idea what he is talking abut. I never believe that humans can be enough accurate to clock the ball, until I found special solution for that. That is most important for computer to work.
Algorithms that determine if clicks will likely produce an inaccurate prediction.				I would definitely never work on other part of computer if I could not make it so perfect.
Number of clicks for ball timings:	2,3,4 or 5	3	10-15: the computer keeps rejecting clicks until clicks of the right speed are made	Any amount is ok, but for system tuning minimums 2 clocked ball revolutions are required.
The more clicks, the greater the accuracy, but the more time it takes to obtain a prediction
Automatic Reset for Accidental Clicks:	YES, adjustable reset time	NO	NO	I am wondering what he thinks that system does if you make accidental click. Maybe sends SMS to casino "I am here".
If you accidentally click the button (i.e. a toe switch while walking), the computer must be able to automatically reset, especially if you don't use an earpi