Previous article was showing effectives of FFA computer in attempt to predict where the ball will hit rotor. Then results were simulated to show what would be final outcome after 10,000 spins. On this graph is displayed the FFA’s real performance on the same wheel.

The FFA was set to get the best accuracy which means that the prediction was set to be later in time. Averaging to 6.8 seconds before then the ball drops.

After playing 5 spins (only) to let the system learn the wheel parameters, I decided to set the offset to +16 pockets. The graphs shows exact final results where the ball was stopping in relation to predicted number. Everything marked with green color is where the advantage is. After analyzing data if someone was playing according to this prediction and covering 11 pockets from -5 to +5 from prediction, he would play with advantage of 53%.

It is average of 4.24 hits per 100 spins for each pocket in green area. It means that for playing $100 per spin in average the player would profit $53 each spin. If he was playing a bit more to the right and covering 6 pockets the advantage would be slightly better 58% because the area marked with yellow color would be avoided. This is a typical problem when playing in real environment. Sometimes players decision where to play is not the best or he wouldn’t be able to cover all numbers as he wants to.

53% and 58% are real advantage figures, after the system overcome negative 2.7% house advantage.

To achieve such advantage of course that we need accurate prediction.

During the test I took notes of only first 30 spins to see how well the system predicts ball failing point.

Recently I have received an email from friend of mine. In his email he referred to Stefano Hourmousis new approach of discrediting the FF roulette computer.
It isn’t really much new, it is only who knows how many times edited version of same page created a year ago.

I better use it and explain what really the roulette prediction is.

The FFA is new roulette computer with design based on previous FF-zap. It is scheduled to be completed in June 2008 or earlier.

The system still uses similar hardware specially designed for accurate timing applications.

In addition the FFA instead of zap sends result in audio format.

Audio can be received directly from the system or via radio link which is already integrated to the system, for additional user.

The kit consist of only single EARPIECE . For $150 additional earpiece is available.

The FF roulette computer will get better and better. Active discussions amongst few owners being made to discuss the future of the FF computer. While all very active users are already familiar with the FF as it is, combining it with personal knowledge and high skills taking advantage as much as it can be taken, there is still place for improvements which may open new possibilities.
In the future, you can expect FF to be more user-friendly, with new features, improvements, and much more. This is just the beginning for changes of combining already achieved highest accuracy with maximum possible practicability.

How well the FF can define roulette ball deceleration?

The graph is created from data stored inside FF after 60 spins. The X coordinate represents the ball time to complete one rotation and Y indicates by how many ms. the ball would slow down per second.

Blue points are only to indicate what would be if we try to define system calculation based on single reference spin. Even if data taken from that spin is 100% accurate it would be imposable to define right curve. But practically for real play we can’t rely on data from single spin, clocked or taken by video camera.

FF works differently, it takes every single spin in to account. But also it analyses clocked data to define is it appropriate or if it has errors.

On leveled roulette wheel definitely not, but let’s look what are our chances on tilted wheel or the wheel with common drop point.

Systems as Genuine Winner expect that dealer constantly spins 15-18 rotations and that rotor is constant therefore we can’t really know where the ball will hit the rotor. We can only say yes, it will be at some positions more often then at the others. Defining where to place chips based on from where the dealer picks up the ball isn’t very smart start at all. He can pick up the ball and spin it within 0.5 sec, next time it can be 1 sec etc. He may spin it once 15 rotations next time 18 or anything in between or even out of targeted limits. Such fast ball at the spins start, we simply wouldn’t be able to estimate within 3 rotations of accuracy.

As an unique individual, Michael has won several millions of dollars in the past investing and managing advantage play operations utilizing concealed computers and covert encrypted communication devices. With one foot in the pit and the other on the gaming floor, Michael believes a gaming risk consultant is only as effective if his knowledge is up to date. For this reason, he makes no excuses for still being actively involved in legal advantage play opportunities. Reference http://www.worldgameprotection.com/speakers/2006.html)

Last month Mike Barnett publicly offered to test any roulette device under controlled conditions on any roulette wheel, including the latest "Anti Drop Zone" and Sling Shot style wheels.

This is first Michael Barnett’s brief review. You can read the same or comments to his review at my forum pages. The unit is supplied in a 4XAA battery box with two of the battery connections removed; the space thus created houses the PC board. The PC board is professionally made and screen printed. The chip used is a Microchip 16F628. This is a nice little chip with ample flash memory and three timers.
The code in the chip is protected so I was not able to examine the Hex file.

But it can be found to Mark Howes site  or http://img5.pictiger.com/546/15455250.jpg?u=1212113004

From: ABC news
"The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) hopes the jailing of a Melbourne man will discourage spam e-mail senders. Twenty-four-year-old Steven George Hourmouzis has been jailed for three months for using the Internet to manipulate the American stock market.

Let’s leave poor Mark Howe alone until he fixes his roulette software. I just noticed Stefano Hourmouzis created new version of page about poor me. http://www.stefanohourmouzis.org/


It is my bad luck, the domain is still with his name. I watched his video and I am asking myself why it looks so scary. This time he put everything in black with only small hole to see the wheel.