Roulette Computer Systems FFA FFZ IQE6 Unlimited

How to choose roulette computer?

2010-07-14T06:27:07Z

Often I was asked which from three roulette computers I would recommend FFA, FFZ or FFV. It is probably the hardest questions I need to answer but I’ll try to answer it in this article.
Past few years I took extreme care that none of products pictures is displayed on the net. I tried to keep physical look of the systems covert as much as it is possible. Understandably for potential buyers it made it harder to decide. Most people made their selection simply by reading information about product or communicating with people who already owned one of FF roulette computers. Since I do not do much of marketing most of products were sold by recommendation I can only imagine how someone new may feel buying something that he can’t even see.

FFZ roulette computer upgrade R5A.

2010-06-16T07:19:39Z

Five years of myrulet.com and FFZ’s 5th birthday

After about 200 hours of work the program has been modified and reconstructed. We selected the best and combined it all in to a single program, this program is suitable for FFV or FFZ systems.

The program can do anything you asked for and a bit more, FFZ as such becomes roulette players dream machine.

Here is a list of some features however I recommend you to watch a sample video in this article which will show some of systems features.

My roulette systems

2010-07-13T14:00:00Z

I don't know much about Blackjack, Poker or other casino games. I don't make a living by selling systems or devices that people want to buy. I merely want to educate other people and give them skills that I have, so they can stop throwing their money into casinos cash cage and expecting a miracle to happen. I also want to learn. The information provided here comes from my own experiences in playing Single Zero Roulette and how to turn the house advantage of 2.7% to your advantage. For all the necessary information why number and progression systems do not work please search for information on the web or ask at my forum. I am familiar with a few visual prediction methods and all of them may gain you some advantage. Strategies like Laurance Scott's crossover patterns, or the Beograd Roulette System used by the Ritz team. I have developed special visual strategies for myself based on my skills, knowledge and needs.

Myrulet Visual Prediction System VB2.

2009-03-20T07:26:37Z

Finally I've decided to write about the way how I play my roulette visual prediction system. What you going to read here definitely isn’t as anything else that you could find on the net for free or that you could purchase somewhere else. VB2 roulette system has a very unique approach. Smart system design provides very accurate prediction but in same time if the system is compared to some other visual ballistic systems is very simple to use. If this system is nicely packed to be sold it would have fair price of few thousand dollars.

Do not buy any roulette computer until you read this

2008-06-10T14:00:00Z

Since I am not really actively promoting this site or creating additional sites to get more links and search engine popularity, you have probably come here from the sites which could have advertisements similar to this.

Cheat roulette with an electronic device. Beat any casino guaranteed.
Learn to play and win at roulette guaranteed with an electronic casino cheating device. More effective than any roulette system or strategy.
Millions can and have been won with my easy and practical winning roulette system.

Interesting enough is how much time they spend creating and writing on all of those web pages to promote their computers and then finding excuses why they are selling them if their computers are so good. Scamming sites are just that. Anyone with solid knowledge of roulette systems will notice that every time I or someone else makes comments to what was strange written on their web sites, these sites get updated. They'll never improve a product but instead upgrade the advertisement to become a better scam.

Do not buy any roulette computer 2/3

2008-07-09T14:00:00Z

This table tells us what is the most important in computerized roulette prediction.

Here we need to understand that without adequate hardware there isn't enough accurate timing and proper error correction is impossible. Also if there isn't proper error correction for errors created due to human reflexes when ball is clocked, calculation can't be accurate because during calculation wrong data would be used. Further more all following requirements would be drastically reduced and meaningless. For example without needed accuracy there is no point of having system which is 100% secure. From this chart we can see that the FFZ is about 75% from the most possible of 100% and the FFA is about 90%.

Roulette computer objectives

Main objective of roulette computer is to measure ball and rotor speed then to predict where the ball will hit rotor. After measured ball and rotor speeds, the computer needs to calculate when the ball will drop and which number will be at that position. How the ball will behave after impact with rotor is pretty much chaotic, also it is specific for each wheel-ball combination.

We can't predict ball jumps across rotor pockets. All we can do in regards that problem is to find how much random it is and where from impact with rotor the ball most of the time should end. In usual this part is 60% random, on some wheels it may be less and on some it can be so high that is practically impossible to have any advantage.

It leaves us with in average of 40% predictability which is still huge since casino has only 2.7% advantage. This means that if we have roulette computer that can accurately predict each time we would change -2.7% in to 40% in our favor. It is huge but can we really do it so accurately.

Do not buy any roulette computer 3/3

2008-07-08T14:00:00Z

Previous article was showing effectives of FFA computer in attempt to predict where the ball will hit rotor. Then results were simulated to show what would be final outcome after 10,000 spins. On this graph is displayed the FFA's real performance on the same wheel.

The FFA was set to get the best accuracy which means that the prediction was set to be later in time. Averaging to 6.8 seconds before then the ball drops.

After playing 5 spins (only) to let the system learn the wheel parameters, I decided to set the offset to +16 pockets. The graphs shows exact final results where the ball was stopping in relation to predicted number. Everything marked with green color is where the advantage is. After analyzing data if someone was playing according to this prediction and covering 11 pockets from -5 to +5 from prediction, he would play with advantage of 53%.

It is average of 4.24 hits per 100 spins for each pocket in green area. It means that for playing $100 per spin in average the player would profit $53 each spin. If he was playing a bit more to the right and covering 6 pockets the advantage would be slightly better 58% because the area marked with yellow color would be avoided. This is a typical problem when playing in real environment. Sometimes players decision where to play is not the best or he wouldn't be able to cover all numbers as he wants to.

53% and 58% are real advantage figures, after the system overcome negative 2.7% house advantage.

To achieve such advantage of course that we need accurate prediction.

During the test I took notes of only first 30 spins to see how well the system predicts ball failing point.

Basic theory

2007-05-20T05:56:18Z

Every roulette ball at some point of its travel is a certain way away from the final winning number. I am not talking distance but time. So lets find by time sample how far in distance we are from that particular time moment. Then it's easy to find how far we are from the winning number by distance.

Simple explanation

For start, I want you to think about this:

You are the cyclist in this picture. Your speed is 20km/h at the point A. Then you stop pedaling and keep rolling towards the point D where your bike stops. Next time you approach point A you have a speed of 30km/h and again in point A you stop pedaling. This time your bike continues past point D moving towards the point F and stops there. The question is what would happen if at the point A you were at the speed of 25km/h when you stopped pedaling. At what point will your bike come to a stop: B, C, D, E or F? The bike should stop at point E, so it would be logical to place bets around point E. The same principle applies to the roulette wheel and the ball and its final position. It is more complicated than the pushbike example, because here we have two objects that are moving in opposite directions with possible variations in speed.

If we at a particular time take samples of the ball and rotor spin speeds those samples can help us to determine the final position by time and when we start taking samples in relationship to previous samples and positions of the rotor of the wheel. As a result of measurements we do not just have these speeds but changes of distance created by different speeds.

If we apply a few processes we can easily predict where the ball will stop. The only reason why we can't be 100% certain in predicting where the ball will stop is because of the scatter due to ball bounce.

Yes, I have to admit that the ball sometimes bounces in unpredictable ways but it is not fully random. Bouncing takes about 40% from a total of 100% accuracy. And my system is not 100% accurate. With E2 two one hundredths of a second error in clicking on the traveling ball position will produce a difference of 1.7 numbers. That is not bad, we are still close to the center of our predicted sector.

Let's imagine that you are playing roulette and visually predicting the section of the wheel where the ball will finish. Of course you can't be perfect. If you are only accurate about 33% of the time then one third of time the ball will stop on one of your eight numbers. What will be your position after playing 30 spins? You will place on the table 30 spins x 8 chips = 240 chips (if the chip value is $2) that is $480.

Because of your inaccuracy in calculating the correct sector and the fact that the ball may bounce and scatter, you will only hit your played sector 10 times out of 30 spins. So you would win 10 spins x 35 + 10 chips (stake) = 360 chips x $2 = $720. So you will be in profit $720 €“ $480 = $240 not so bad for about one hour of play.

A good visual tracking strategy gives an advantage of about 6% over the house. By carefully selecting the croupier, the table, the wheel and the ball I sometimes manage to make profit of $5000 in one hour. This is by increasing my bet size after winning few spins. Learn the strategy and for you the game will never be just a random win or a game of luck.

Luck and Roulette

Luck is still a significant factor in this game of roulette. After years of playing I consider myself an expert in roulette prediction. Sometimes my results are affected by luck, sometimes good luck sometimes bad luck.

I remember one time I lost and I was constantly predicting the winning sector. But the ball would stop one or two numbers on either side of my predicted numbers or it would stop on a number which I had missed putting a bet on because of the time limit in placing chips. After a while I made adjustments to my playing sector but then the ball would hit the other end of my sector and so on.

However I also remember playing with a new Croupier from the USA. In 20 spins, 18 times the speed of the wheel was constant and the speed of the ball was constant and I was winning and winning. Within 60 minutes my money multiplied by a factor of 100. Then the Casino changed the Croupier, I found him later on another table but when I began to play he started changing the wheel and ball speed. I struck up a conversation with him and he told me that he was instructed by the Casino Supervisors to do this.

I am not a gambler so why do I gamble?

It all started 20 years ago in my little hometown in the Communist country of Croatia.

So, the big communists opened up a small casino, only two roulette tables, and in my little town the people were losing money that they were working so hard to earn.

And I was one of those people. At that time I was 20 years old and employed as a tele-communication technical officer and earning $400 - $500 per month.

Occasionally I would go to that little casino with my friends after coming back from the discos. We would lose all our money there.

Then once I was on holiday and in another little casino I met an older man and he gave me some tips how to play. ( I will pass that FREE tip on to you shortly.)

After I started using his way of playing I noticed that I was winning $50-$100 every night. That was good money for me as I was only earning was about $400 a month and at that time and place a bottle of brandy cost me $5 or a pack of cigarettes $1.

It lasted for about two months. The Casino was located in the basement of city hotel. That year the water level of the river was so high that underground water flooded into the casino. It was the end of that little casino.

Soon after that I migrated to Australia where I still live. Here I did not gamble for 10 years. I finished more schooling and study and worked for 9 years as an Electronics Engineer for a large Tele-communications Company.

Then globalization came. All manufacturing was shifted to Asia. As a result of that I was given the opportunity to take a redundancy package, quite a large sum of money and the opportunity to start my own business. Starting in business by myself was hard. How do I keep the standard of lifestyle as it was before? We are a family with two kids and a dog.

So the same story again. One night I went to the Casino with my friends. I played the same way as the old man back in the little casino had told me and I won $600, and a few nights later another $1300 then $900. Then I start losing, then wining then losing and so on. I realized that this is not the same as back in that little Casino and I started using my engineering diagnostic skills to figure out what's going on? What is the difference and what can I do? Of all the games in the Casino I play only roulette because I could not see how I can have an advantage in the other Casino games but I believed it was possible with this game!

How Did I Play? (Your FREE tip)

The old man told me to look at the reference number under the Croupier's hand at the point hen they release the ball. Compare how far from that number on the wheel to the final number in which the ball stops. After a few measurements define the angle and always place the bets from the reference number shifted by the same angle.

Example: For easy understanding lets consider the roulette wheel as a circle divided in 12 numbers like a clock. Do not forget that the ball is usually spun once clockwise and the next time counter-clockwise. If the croupier releases the ball clockwise from above the 2 o'clock point and ball stops in the 6 o'clock pocket this means that there would four numbers difference to the right or clockwise. So if next time Croupier throws clockwise releasing from above the 6 o'clock point the ball should stop at the 10 o'clock position. For this kind of play to be successful you need to find croupier with consistent spins who has developed a rhythm. But that's not all. Later on I realized that the advantage achieved by playing in this way is possible only if the wheel is tilted. That is if the ball speeds up when it runs down one side of wheel and then slows down as it goes up the other side of the wheel and drops off the track consistently striking the same few diamonds or deflectors above the number ring and pockets.

Big Casino versus Little Casino

It took me a while to figure out why I was always winning in the small Casino and only sometimes in this big one. The way I was playing is called taking advantage of a Croupiers signature. The theory is that a ball will be thrown with the same force so it will spin the same number of spins and should stop the same number of pockets away from last spin release point.

In the small Casino the gambling industry was new and Croupiers didn't know about this flaw. They were just spinning and spinning consistently. And they never leveled wheels or even checked the level. The Government owned the Casino and no one really cared.

In the big Casinos croupiers are trained to notice smart players and how to counteract them. So they deliberately change wheel and ball speeds, and these days most Casinos are checking the level of wheels on daily bases and they even move the wheels from table to table or rotate the adjustable number ring so it is not adjacent to the same actual pocket as it was say last week.

My first challenge to win at roulette whenever I played was to study Croupiers. Some are good and some spin too fast and inconsistent. While I studied them they also studied me and began to remember me as the guy who was consistently winning. So they had to change their spinning technique every time I came to play at their wheel. My only option was to wait for a new Croupier and then play fast until they noticed me winning or a Supervisor would come and tell the Croupier to change the intensity and consistency of their ball spin and speed of the wheel.

During that period of play which lasted about three years, I played and improved the old man's roulette strategy four times. I began to do some calculations and found that very small variations in speed make a big difference for the end result.

It's like this: One roulette game example;

Number of ball turns around the wheel = 20

Number, wheel turns around the center = 8

Because they are in opposite directions we can add them. This means that ball will pass this many pockets, 37 x 28 = 1036.

That is long distance.

If a ball gets just a fraction more power at start that may result in the ball ending up on opposite side of the wheel.

My challenge was to find the way to detect that change in speed and calculate necessary adjustments. It took me 4 years to come to this level and in that time I improved my way of playing a lot.

Actually there are two main ways to predict where the ball would stop.

One way is legal and is developed by visually tracking the ball and predicting where it would stop. This gives me a small advantage over the Casino. The other way is illegal in most Countries and includes use of a specially designed electronical device attached to your body that signals you. This is more accurate and gives me a large advantage over the Casino.

All this is based on my own skills on how to use my device and on data I've collected in recent times. As I said, it took me 4 years of intensive thinking and experimenting to develop a system that is so balanced.

Why the system works as it works would be hard to understand for most ordinary people. The user needs to understand the details to be able to best use it. It's the same as for a non technical person to understand how only three colors red, green and blue can make so many different colors on a TV screen including white and black. Most people are just happy to use the TV.

With supporting documents and a graphical presentation and simulation it should not be any problem to learn how to best use the device.

Advanced theory

2007-05-19T08:00:00Z

This is old material, since then a lot of work on the system has been done.

From the moment of developing great control of manual ball clocking myrulet systems developed gradually from E2 to E5 , E6 and finally IQE6.

To be able to use the Forester's E2 system the user needs to understand system limits.To obtain the best results he needs to know where, how and why the system is accurate. The E2 system works in very different way compared to any other system known to me.

Some methods try to take samples of the ball and the wheel speeds, add to those additional parameters such as: atmospheric pressure, humidity, temperature, hand cream on the Croupier's hands and who knows what else? With all of that they are trying to calculate how long the ball will run in the track and in what position will the wheel be at the moment the ball strikes it? From my work that is a very difficult method. Even with accurate algorithms the errors can be so high that prediction would be almost random. I have information from all parts of the world and from people that own that kind of computing device and I do not know of a single person that is happy with that kind of solution alone.

The main problem is with the data input. We as humans have a reflex response time. And that time is not always the same, so pressing a switch manually at time intervals of 0.5 secs and with the required accuracy of 10 milliseconds is impossible. Don't take my word for it, perform the test yourself. Take a stopwatch, start it, then try to stop it at example 1.000 sec, so you will see how inaccurate you would be and how much your response time changes. There are additional options to overcome that such as to use a number of clicks and to take the average but it is still inaccurate. An error of only 3 milliseconds when timing the ball would produce about one number change in the prediction.

The E2 system is a combination of electronics and visual observation. The human eye is very fast and with no response time. The E2 system uses our basic theory. As we have said€¦

Every roulette ball at some point of its travel is a particular way away from the final winning number. We are not talking distance away but time away from the final number. So we find out by time sampling how far in distance we are from that particular time moment. Then it's easy to find how far we are from the winning number by distance.

At the same time we need to relate the position of the ball to the position of the wheel and specifically to the position of the numbers on the wheel and apply a formula to the changing speed of the wheel as it slows down. The perfect algorithm must also take into account the fact that both and especially the ball can slow down at different rates at different times and speeds and positions on the ball track. Sounds complicated? The perfect algorithm is, more on this later.

Simple explanation for that is that for example exactly 10seconds before the end the ball is so far from the winning number. Maybe it is not 100% true because the ball can be affected by some additional factors, but it is true for most of the time. So why calculate every time if function is the same. I am using already known function in form of previous results. If we have device that can tell us 100% with some particular speed it would not be hard to notice what number is at that moment under the ball and compare it with previous spin. (Assuming same wheel speed)

Without device as that one we need to apply process that I am going to explain here. If we unroll one spin backwards excluding ball bouncing, (which is really part of our offset) we can display it as following graph. The ref. points are places in time intervals when the ball meets winning number - bouncing. So let's say that winning number was zero. Here we can see that during this spin ball crossed winning number 27 times.

Blue points are representing positions when the ball is crossing winning number. When we start playing any of my systems we do not know all that information because the spin is still going. We enter at one point and we do not know where it is in relationship to our ref. points. So my system is designed to tell us in numbers or angles, how far from our observed number (which is usually zero) is winning number. That distance is in proportional relationship with our entry time, current speed of the ball and the wheel, and the closest Ref. point. All this is hard to explain and I assume that might be hard to understand. So lets look one simple example.

One spin the ball is over number zero at Ref. points and zero is winning number. We apply system and we are out of the closest Ref. point by 0.2 sec. That time will reflect as (zero / ball) angle change within our time frame and will guide and tell us that 0.2 sec before then we start measurement number zero was in Ref. position. And of course that it is our winning number.

If we are taking our time sample from 100 numbers per second to 50 numbers /s it means that at start when we start, compared to the end everything is happening with double speed. Lets say that we start 10 numbers late from our 100 numbers per/s ref. point. When we exit time sampling it will show us only as 5 numbers difference because everything is 50% slower. Now that 5 numbers we multiply with 2 and we get how much late did we start.

If looking that on the wheel it would be 10 numbers from zero, it is number 9. And 5 numbers from zero is number 28. So now from number nine to number 28 is angle of about 50°. We add another 50° and it will indicate again to zero which is winning number for this example. We can look at that as time too. Example; if we start 0.4 sec after 80 numbers / s. It means that for that time period the ball makes 0.4 x 80 = 32 numbers. On the wheel it points to number 28 meaning that we released switch at number 28. The end of time sample we will be 0.4 sec late from 40 numbers / s, so it would show as 0.4 x 40 = 16. That would point to number 8. We notice angle from number 28 to number 8. Add on top of that same angle and again it tell us that winning number is zero. Those 32 numbers really means that we are late by so much from ref. point. It really does not matter do we start 20 sec or 15 sec before the end or which number we use for observation.

Here we are coming to very important part for all users of my system. This knowledge is important for the accuracy of the system. Next graph displays amount of numbers that ball pass during each spin. We can accurately use only part of those 20 spins as displayed on graph above. The reason for that is that ball is slowing down faster then the rotor. Until ball makes 360° full rotation the wheel also do some traveling. With higher speeds the function is still linear (or close to linear) but as we can see that last 8 spins the function significantly changes. If we want to observe change of the ball in relationship to the wheel we would not be able to notice it properly within these requirements.
Take note here that last 5 spins is about 10 seconds. So when we apply system we need to exit before that time or errors will start to show. That is why the best time to enter is 19-14 sec before the end. That is great and leave us with lot of time to place bets. But for that we need very accurate device. Time accuracy of my device is 0.000001 seconds, and it is very stable. Human delay errors are almost none.

We are trying to release switch at zero and many time we will miss it, but that is not problem at all because we see it, and if we released switch at number 19 instead of zero we use number 19 as our observing number. It means that we can use any number and system will accurately show how much that number is shifted from winning number. I use zero or numbers around zero because they are easier to notice. The system is very applicable and accurate during measurements.

How is change of the wheel speed included in all of that? The answer is very simple. It is positioning and balancing of the system. With visual system we can not see that because it will show only as a ball position change but multiplying factor is the same so it really does not matter did the ball or the wheel made that change, Change of wheel speed with visual system placing it out of balance faster. Visual system can not handle well a significant wheel speed change but electronics one can. Because it is used reference time as reference to compare. I explained that process in details on CD with presentation.
Win or lose

If casino has only 2.7% advantage over players how come that people lose so much money at roulette table? If there are equal chances I think that casino would still win most of the time. The reason for that is that casino if compared to player has unlimited time and unlimited money. Player will never know when he is at pick of his winnings or when circle of bad luck will stop. Here I will display approximate graph of one standard play.

Yellow color represent winnings from each spin, red color is amount of chips played and
blue is total balance , amount of chips that player has after each spin.

The most important point here is when blue line touches zero. It means that player lost all 100 chips. And that he is out of game. On this graph if he had just few more chips he would start winning and he would get his money back. But in real game player will never know that. He will come next time and maybe he will be luckier. It means that he will start playing when graph is going positive direction. When we play system that give us advantage over casino lets say 10% we still can lose because of previously described process. We can start playing and from start we can always miss by number or 2. I would call it bad luck. That is why balancing of our total chips and amount of chips that we play is very important until we come to safe zone. That is meaning if we start with 200 chips, we play 5 chips per spin. We should not significantly increase it until we come to comfort zone of about 500 chips. Then we can start playing about 15-20 (not 15-20 numbers) chips per spin and try to go for more.

If system has 10% advantage it really does not meter do we play sector of lets say 9 numbers or if we play only one number. Theoretically it is true but I am not happy

Roulette Computer IQE6

2007-05-22T12:07:25Z

Soon more will be published, for now only block diagram how IQE6 works.